Star Magazine Disses Scandalous Candice

Flash back to last week's issue of Star Magazine. That issue right there with an Olsen troll on the cover.

Inside this issue is an article about Michelle Williams and how she is holding up with the hype of all of this Batman mania.

I was contacted about an article I wrote months ago. I had a friend who wished to stay anonymous, tell me about how Matilda and her son played at the Children's Museum in Boston. I agreed to talk about the story provided it wasn't a smear piece on Michelle. I like her and I didn't want anything to do with smearing her.


Michelle Williams In Boston

I got called by Star Magazine and talked to them for a little bit about it. They said they would reference my blog as the source. As I went through the article, not one mention of me or my blog. But one of my quotes, which is in my article, and what I said in a phone interview, was on the front cover of the story. And they misquoted me. And worst of all they labeled me as an insider.

I am not an insider. My source is not really an insider either. I do not know Michelle Williams. I have never met her. My source talked to someone with Michelle but not directly to Michelle. So not only did they diss me and misquote me, they misrepresented me. Bastards!

I even said about my own article that after going back and reading it, it wasn't my intention to paint Michelle as a "Debbie Downer." But listening to my source whose kid played with Matilda, it seemed hard. Hard to do the daily life stuff. But I felt like my own piece might have come across like she was a bad mother or a distant mother. And she isn't. She is still very much effected, but is in no way an absent mother.

Basically there was a lot discussed, but none of it made it to the cheap article accept for a lame quote.

That quote in the green tag is mine.

Comments

[justagirl]

That's crap! what a-holes!